Research

High-redshift galaxies,
read statistically.

My research is observational extragalactic astrophysics with a statistical core: extracting the physical properties of galaxies in the early universe from multiwavelength photometric catalogs — the kind with noise, selection effects, censored measurements, and missing bands — using probabilistic models that carry that uncertainty end to end.

Ph.D. thesis

Statistical study of the galaxy populations at high redshift from multiwavelength catalogs

Ph.D. in Physics & Astronomy · University of California, Riverside · 2017–2021

Thread I · Star-forming sequence

Modeling the quiescent fraction, jointly.

I built a single probabilistic model for the star-forming sequence that fits three galaxy types at once — star-forming, star-burst, and transitioning/quiescent — as a mixture on the SFR–mass plane, and simultaneously infers the probability that a galaxy is quiescent as a function of its stellar mass and local environment. Stellar-mass uncertainties, censored SFRs, and the stellar mass function are all modeled together, with inference in Stan by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.

SFR versus stellar mass mixture model across redshift
Star formation · mixture model

Star-forming sequence over cosmic time

SFR vs. stellar mass in five redshift bins. Points are colored by their posterior probability of belonging to each component — quiescent (red), star-burst (green), star-forming (blue); lines and bands are posterior draws of the mean relation and its 2σ intrinsic scatter. The hatched region marks the mass-completeness limit.

Stellar mass functions by galaxy type and redshift
Populations

Stellar mass functions

Total, star-forming, and transitioning/quiescent stellar mass functions by redshift, obtained by weighting the inferred mass distribution by galaxy-type probability and integrating over environment. The quiescent population builds up rapidly toward lower z.

Mass and environmental quenching efficiency
Quenching

Mass & environmental quenching efficiency

Environmental quenching efficiency rises with redshift at lower masses and increases with stellar mass — the imprint expected if the most massive galaxies deplete their gas fastest (the “overconsumption” picture).

Quiescent probability versus stellar mass
p(Quiescent | M, Δ)

Quiescent probability vs. stellar mass

In panels of redshift, colored by local density contrast. The probability of being transitioning/quiescent increases with stellar mass at every environment and epoch.

Quiescent probability versus local density
p(Quiescent | M, Δ)

Quiescent probability vs. environment

The same probability against local density contrast, colored by stellar mass. Above ~1010.5 M denser regions raise the quiescent fraction out to z ~ 3; at low mass the trend reverses around z ~ 1–1.5.

What the model finds
  • Mass drives quiescence everywhere. The quiescent fraction rises with stellar mass at every environment and redshift probed.
  • Environment matters most for massive galaxies. Above ~1010.5 M, denser environments raise the chance of being quiescent out to z ~ 3; at lower masses the effect reverses around z ~ 1–1.5.
  • Mass and environment interact at early times. Above z ~ 1.2 their interaction becomes important — the effect of environment grows with stellar mass.
  • Consistent with overconsumption. Environmental quenching efficiency increases with both redshift and stellar mass, as expected if the most massive galaxies deplete their gas fastest.
Thread II · Selection

Finding massive evolved galaxies at 3 ≤ z ≤ 4.5.

My first-author work builds a complete, statistically characterized sample of massive, already-evolved galaxies in the early universe — rare objects easily confused with dusty star-formers. It combines rest-frame color selections with machine-learning on the full multiwavelength catalog, assigning each candidate a likelihood rather than a hard yes/no.

sSFR and rest-frame color selection of massive evolved galaxies
Galaxy selection

Selecting in sSFR & color space

Specific SFR vs. stellar mass with the z = 6 threshold (top), and rest-frame UVJ and observed near-infrared colors (bottom). Points are shaded by the likelihood each method — Balmer-break, UVJ, and SED — assigns to a candidate.

3D UMAP embedding of the galaxy color catalog
Manifold learning

A 3D color-space embedding

UMAP projects the high-dimensional color catalog into three dimensions. High-z quiescent galaxies separate cleanly from the rest of the manifold, which also organizes smoothly by redshift, stellar mass, and SFR — in both training and held-out testing projections.

Methods

The statistical toolkit.

Hierarchical Bayes

Mixture models

Three galaxy types modeled jointly on the SFR–mass plane, with a logit link for the quiescent fraction in stellar mass, density, and their interaction — over samples reaching ~1M galaxies.

Noise & censoring

Latent-variable likelihood

Measurement errors, censored (upper-limit) SFRs, and a Schechter stellar mass function are built into one likelihood and marginalized consistently, inferred with Stan / HMC.

Manifold learning

Reducing color space

UMAP, t-SNE and supervised PCA bring dimensionality reduction to SED fitting — compressing many photometric bands into a space where galaxy types separate.

Data & surveys

CANDELS — five multiwavelength fields (UV to mid-IR)
Photometric redshifts — Kodra et al. combined PDFs
SFRs — UV+IR calibration (Barro et al.)
Stellar masses — SED fitting (LePhare, BC03)
Local density — weighted KDE fields (Chartab et al.)
Santa Cruz SAM — semi-analytic color catalogs

Observing experience

3 nights with MOSFIRE on Keck II, Mauna Kea, Hawaiʻi
2016 Observational Astronomy Workshop, Lick Observatory, Mt. Hamilton, California
ExtragalacticPhotometric redshifts SED fittingEnvironment Quenching